Category: Whitehall

There have been some reports that one of the three seats on the Board of Education (contested in Tuesday’s election) is for a one-year term. This is contrary to the legal notice that the school district ran announcing the election.

The three seats open on the Board of Education were identified in the district’s legal notice as two 5-year terms and one term to fill the unexpired term of George Armstrong which is set to expire in 2016 (4 years). See the legal notice announcing the board of education election and the terms for those elected. Is the district now saying that the term of the person replacing George Armstrong is for one year? If so, this seems to be contrary to the their own legal notice.

The school district election was held on Tuesday, May 15th.

Three seats were open on the school board, with James Brooks being the only candidate on the ballot who had submitted a petition to run. However there were a number of write-in candidates who joined the contest late. Mark Ives from Dresden was one write-in candidate, and other write-in candidates were evidently written in at the election booth by several voters.

I contacted the school district at 2:30 pm and spoke to Martha Bascue, the District Clerk. She informed me that the write-in votes were still being tabulated and that no vote totals would be released until the election was official. She said nine different names had been written in and that a number of ballots were being looked at still, and that they had to contact their legal counsel. She said there were approximately 60 write-in votes. I asked how many votes were in question and if any vote totals could be released. Ms. Bascue said that the vote totals would not be released at this time. She suggested that I call back on Thursday, May 17th.

Ms. Bascue did provide me with the names of the people “written in” as candidates in this order (there may be spelling mistakes):

Samantha Kingsley
Mark Ives
Robert Putorti, Jr.
Joyce Corcoran
T. Scrime
Michael Putorti
Rick Juckett
Andre Gordon
Eric Sunduttl

This is an important issue, because the top two write-in candidates would serve one 5 year term on the school board and the other would serve a 4 year term. I personally find the fact that no vote totals have been released yet to be a bit troubling, as well as the fact that the number of ballots being looked at for possible issues is also unknown.

The budget passed with 190 votes “for” and 25 “opposed”.

The proposition to buy a new school bus passed with 153 votes “for” and 35 “opposed”.

More on this as it develops.

Imagine an election where there are no contested seats and no candidate states a position beforehand? That’s what is happening on Tuesday in the Whitehall school board election, where there are three open seats and only one candidate who has submitted a petition to run. While I submitted a questionnaire to the one announced candidate, he has not returned it as of the date of this post.

I find this disappointing on a number of levels but this appears to be the new normal in regards to the Whitehall school board. While I personally believe our democracy and institutions deserve better, unless people step up and run for the seats in question, the candidates running unopposed can simply take this position. I’ve posted the questions below that I submitted to the declared candidate so you will at least know what I asked.

The election and vote on next year’s budget is Tuesday, May 15th from noon to 9 pm in the large group instructional room at the Whitehall High School.

Questions submitted to candidate (which to date have not been answered).

1.) Could you please tell us about yourself and why you are running for the school board?

5.) The job market today is a highly competitive one. What should the school district be doing that it is not already doing to see that its graduates have the skills and education necessary for success?

The Whitehall School District will have an election Tuesday, May 15th between 12:00 noon and 9:00 p.m. in the Large Group Instructional Room of the Junior/Senior High School on Buckley Road:

1.) To adopt next years budget.
2.) To elect three (3) members of the school board.

I am planning on submitting questionnaires to all those running for the school board.

My disappointment with the school board for some time has been that the steady yearly declines in enrollment have not translated into reduced property taxes.

In the past few days, school district “report cards” were released for the 2010-2011 school year. This is the last publicly available information on enrollment. So the most up to date information is for the LAST school year.

Numbers for the current school year (2011-2012) and projections for next year (2012-2013) are not available. However as you can see, enrollment has been falling in the Whitehall School District (and is projected to continue to fall) while property taxes have increased over the same period. So here is a table (compiled from public sources) for the last seven years of available data.

As you can see, there has been an overall drop in total enrollment of almost 15% during the last seven years. Enrollment has declined every year during that time.

The three biggest individual yearly losses of students: 30, 36, and 26, have all happened over the last three years. In other words, the decline in yearly enrollment is accelerating.

When the school board claims they have cut spending, they have.

Except that it all comes from the state aid side as the state of New York has cut its aid to school districts.

The falling enrollment has not amounted to any cuts in property taxes. Losing 132 students over a seven year period (92 in the last three) resulted in no property tax savings for the local property taxpayers.

So there are the enrollment numbers for you to see.

The Post Star has an article on the recent deliberations by the school board on next year’s budget.

You can read the Post Star article here.

While it’s nice to learn that the school board is taking some steps to control next year’s budget, the entire story still leads to more local stagnation.

Local property taxes still go up under next year’s budget, enrollment is projected to fall again (per student spending continues to rise), and funds will be moved from reserve accounts to balance the budget. At the end of the day, the school district is working on a proposed budget of $13,205,125 for approximately 750 students!

To put this in context, calculated on a per-student basis, this approaches or exceeds the tuition for many elite private schools across the country. However, Whitehall is ranked as one of the lower performing schools in the state. Because the school district’s enrollment has declined, and is predicted to decline further in the future, this should be the perfect time to be cutting spending and property taxes.

An easy way to look at a school’s enrollment is to take the students graduating from high school and see if the pre-school/kindergarten enrollment for the next year matches, falls below, or exceeds the number graduating.

A hypothetical example follows. Take a school where 120 students graduate and 60 students enter for a number of years. As time goes by, instead of needing roughly six classes per grade (calculated at 20 students per class) only three classes per grade would be necessary to accommodate the lower enrollment. The class size of 20 students per class though would stay the same.

If managed properly, the number of classes per grade fall as the overall enrollment declines and the younger grades graduate to the next level. Once again, if instituted correctly, the number of classes shrink as the lower grades move up through the school.

However, public sentiment can be manipulated if proposals are made to cut classes in grades with higher enrollment. Take the hypothetical example above; if you told the parents in a grade with 120 students, that half the teachers in that grade would be eliminated, and class sizes were going to jump to 40 students per class, there would be a public outcry.

If managed improperly, there are wild differences in class size and the number of classes by grade. Public sentiment can be easily swayed with arguments over increased class size.

Sadly Whitehall’s destruction of its tax base is noticeable by all; businesses have left, houses sit on the market unsold, people leave for jobs elsewhere. So while we’re paying property taxes like our local district is an elite private school, we’re dealing with one of the lowest ranked districts in the state. The numbers tell a story. Throwing money at the problem has been shown not to work. The only way to turn things around is to cut property taxes. Until the school board learns that lesson, Whitehall’s demise will sadly continue.